N

NEXT
HIGH SCHOOL
Relations between the writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry James Thoreau (his student) and the activists Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.
Self-Reliance
by Ralph Waldo Emerson
1841
[1] Society everywhere is in conspiracy against the manhood of every one of its members. Society is a joint-stock company, in which the members agree, for the better securing of his bread to each shareholder, to surrender the liberty and culture of the eater. The virtue in most request is conformity. Self-reliance is its aversion. It loves not realities and creators, but names and customs.
[2] Whoso would be a man must be a nonconformist. He who would gather immortal palms must not be hindered by the name of goodness, but must explore if it be goodness. Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind. Absolve you to yourself, and you shall have the suffrage of the world. I remember an answer which when quite young I was prompted to make to a valued adviser, who was wont to importune me with the dear old doctrines of the church. On my saying, What have I to do with the sacredness of traditions, if I live wholly from within? my friend suggested, — "But these impulses may be from below, not from above." I replied, "They do not seem to me to be such; but if I am the Devil's child, I will live then from the Devil." No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature. Good and bad are but names very readily transferable to that or this; the only right is what is after my constitution, the only wrong what is against it. A man is to carry himself in the presence of all opposition, as if every thing were titular and ephemeral but he. I am ashamed to think how easily we capitulate to badges and names, to large societies and dead institutions. Every decent and well-spoken individual affects and sways me more than is right. I ought to go upright and vital, and speak the rude truth in all ways. If malice and vanity wear the coat of philanthropy, shall that pass?"
In red: key aspects of the discourse
In blue: probably unknown vocabulary
Underlined: probably unknown language structure
Vocabulary (Oxford Dictionary)
Joint-stock company: a company whose stock is owned jointly by the shareholders.
Shareholder: an owner of shares in a company.
Share: a part or portion of a larger amount that is divided among a number of people, or to which a number of people contribute
Conformity: 1.behavior in accordance with socially accepted conventions or standards; 2.compliance with standards, rules, or laws.
Whoso: archaic term for whoever. Click here to learn how to pronounce it.
Hindered: from the verb "to hinder": create difficulties for (someone or something), resulting in delay or obstruction. ORIGIN Old English: hindrian ‘injure or damage’.
Absolve: set or declare (someone) free from blame, guilt, or responsibility. ORIGIN late Middle English: from Latin absolvere ‘set free, acquit,’ from ab- ‘from’ + solvere ‘loosen.’
Shall: 1. (in the first person) expressing the future tense: this time next week I shall be in Scotland. 2. expressing a strong assertion or intention: they shall succeed | you shall not frighten me out of this. 3 expressing an instruction or command: you shall not steal. 4 used in questions indicating offers or suggestions: shall I send you the book?
Suffrage: 1 the right to vote in political elections. • archaic a vote given in assent to a proposal or in favor of the election of a particular person. 2 (usu. suffrages) a series of intercessory prayers or petitions.
Prompted: from the verb to prompt: 1.cause (someone) to take a course of action; 2.assist or encourage (a hesitating speaker) to say something
Wont: in the habit of doing something; accustomed.
Importune: ask (someone) pressingly and persistently for or to do something; from Latin "importunus": ‘inconvenient’.
Wholly: entirely; fully
Readily: without hesitation or reluctance; without delay or difficulty; easily.
Titular: holding or constituting a purely formal position or title without any real authority
Ephemeral: lasting for a very short time.
Sway: [ with obj. ] control or influence (a person or course of action): he's easily swayed by other people.Literaly: rule; govern: now let the Lord forever reign and sway us as he will.
Upright: vertical; (of a person or their behavior) strictly honorable or honest.
Nothing is sacred but the integrity of your mind: the only thing sacred is the integrity of your mind.
Good and bad are but names: they are nothing but names, they are only names.
A man is to carry himself as if every thing were titular and ephemeral but he: a man needs to behave in a way that everything is secondary but he: except for himself - the only one not superfluous is himself. All the rest is superfluous.
Civil Disobedience
by Henry David Thoreau
1849
[1] Unjust laws exist; shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once? Men generally, under such a government as this, think that they ought to wait until they have persuaded the majority to alter them. They think that, if they should resist, the remedy would be worse than the evil. But it is the fault of the government itself that the remedy is worse than the evil. It makes it worse. Why is it not more apt to anticipate and provide for reform? Why does it not cherish its wise minority? Why does it cry and resist before it is hurt? Why does it not encourage its citizens to be on the alert to point out its faults, and do better than it would have them? Why does it always crucify Christ, and excommunicate Copernicus and Luther, and pronounce Washington and Franklin rebels?
[2] One would think, that a deliberate and practical denial of its authority was the only offence never contemplated by government; else, why has it not assigned its definite, its suitable and proportionate, penalty? If a man who has no property refuses but once to earn nine shillings for the State, he is put in prison for a period unlimited by any law that I know, and determined only by the discretion of those who placed him there; but if he should steal ninety times nine shillings from the State, he is soon permitted to go at large again.
[3] If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go, let it go; perchance it will wear smooth — certainly the machine will wear out. If the injustice has a spring, or a pulley, or a rope, or a crank, exclusively for itself, then perhaps you may consider whether the remedy will not be worse than the evil; but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law. Let your life be a counter friction to stop the machine. What I have to do is to see, at any rate, that I do not lend myself to the wrong which I condemn.
[4] I have never declined paying the highway tax, because I am as desirous of being a good neighbor as I am of being a bad subject; and as for supporting schools, I am doing my part to educate my fellow-countrymen now. It is for no particular item in the tax-bill that I refuse to pay it. I simply wish to refuse allegiance to the State, to withdraw and stand aloof from it effectually. I do not care to trace the course of my dollar, if I could, till it buys a man or a musket to shoot one with — the dollar is innocent — but I am concerned to trace the effects of my allegiance. In fact, I quietly declare war with the State, after my fashion, though I will still make what use and get what advantage of her I can, as is usual in such cases.
[5] If others pay the tax which is demanded of me, from a sympathy with the State, they do but what they have already done in their own case, or rather they abet injustice to a greater extent than the State requires. If they pay the tax from a mistaken interest in the individual taxed, to save his property, or prevent his going to jail, it is because they have not considered wisely how far they let their private feelings interfere with the public good.
[6] This, then, is my position at present.
Vocabulary (Oxford Dictionary)
Endeavor to amend: try to improve.
Ought to wait: have to wait, need to wait.
Denial: the refusal of something.
To earn nine shillings for the State: obtain money (shilling: former British monetary unit) working and give it to the State.
Perchance: perhaps, maybe, by some chance.
Wear out: become unusable because of extensive use.
Spring, pulley, crank: a helical metal coil used to exert tension: "the mattress has lost its spring" (spring); a wheel to raise have weights (pulley); turn a handle to start an engine (crank)
Withdraw: remove.
Obs: In the paragraph "If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government....", the author compares the government to a machine that operates in a way that is unjust. This machine, a metaphor for the government, has a "spring", a "pulley", a "rope" and a "crank", these are words used for the parts of a machine. For the author, this unjust machine will "wear out", will become unusable, will break down in the end.
Understanding Questions:
According to Emerson's text "Self-reliance",
1. Does society respect individuality?
2. Why is society like a joint-stock company?
3. In society, conformity is a virtue or a vice? Why?
4. Why does the author think a man should be a nonconformist?
5. What does the author think about society's traditions, institutions and doctrines, created to secure men's rights?
6. Explain the sentece "If malice and vanity wear the coat of philanthropy, shall that pass?"
Civil Disobedience
by Henry David Thoreau
Analysis and Research Questions:
1. What's the the text's genre?
2. What's the context of its publication?
3. Who's the author?
4. Does the text relate to a literary traditon or movement? Which one?
5. When the author says men should be nonconformists because "nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind", is he appealing to ethos, pathos or logos? Explain.
Understanding Questions:
According to Thoreau's text "Civil Disobedience",
1. How should men behave in relation to unjust laws?
2. How does government treat wise people, who dare question its rules?
3. Can a man be prisioned for an unlimited period of time? In what case?
4. What about in the case of stealing?
5. Why does the author now refuses to pay the highway tax?
6. When you pay a tax to a government that is unjust, are you financing injustice?
7. Does the author appeal to men's logos, pathos or ethos? Explain.
Analysis and Research Questions:
1. What's the the text's genre?
2. What's the context of its publication?
3. Who's the author?
4. Does the text relate to a literary traditon or movement? Which one?
5. What's the influence of Emerson in Thoreau's texts?
6. Compare Thoureau's and Emerson's idea of conformity to a society and to a government.
I have a dream
by Martin Luther King Jr.
I have a dream
by Martin Luther King Jr.
August, 28, 1963
[1] I am happy to join with you today in what will go down in history as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation.
Five score years ago, a great American [Abraham Lincoln], in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity.
But one hundred years later, the Negro still is not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languished in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land. And so we've come here today to dramatize a shameful condition.
[2] In a sense we've come to our nation's capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the "unalienable Rights" of "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note, insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check, a check which has come back marked "insufficient funds."
But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. And so, we've come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice.
[3] We have also come to this hallowed spot to remind America of the fierce urgency of Now. This is no time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism. Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. Now is the time to make justice a reality for all of God's children.
[4] It would be fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment. This sweltering summer of the Negro's legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality. Nineteen sixty-three is not an end, but a beginning. And those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam and will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual. And there will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights. The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges.
[5] But there is something that I must say to my people, who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice: In the process of gaining our rightful place, we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again, we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.
[6] The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to a distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny. And they have come to realize that their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom.
We cannot walk alone.
[7] And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead.
[8] We cannot turn back.
[9] There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, "When will you be satisfied?" We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality. We can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities. We cannot be satisfied as long as the negro's basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one. We can never be satisfied as long as our children are stripped of their self-hood and robbed of their dignity by signs stating: "For Whites Only." We cannot be satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New York believes he has nothing for which to vote. No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until "justice rolls down like waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream." [Amos 5:24 - The American Standard Version of the Holy Bible]
[10] I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells. And some of you have come from areas where your quest -- quest for freedom left you battered by the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality. You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the faith that unearned suffering is redemptive. Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed.
[11] Let us not wallow in the valley of despair, I say to you today, my friends.
[12] And so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.
I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal."
[13] I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia, the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.
[14] I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.
[15] I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.
[16] I have a dream today!
[17] I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of "interposition" and "nullification" -- one day right there in Alabama little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers.
[18] I have a dream today!
[19] I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, and every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight; "and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed and all flesh shall see it together." [Isaiah 40:4-5 (King James Version of the Holy Bible)]This is our hope, and this is the faith that I go back to the South with.
[20] With this faith, we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith, we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.
[21] And this will be the day -- this will be the day when all of God's children will be able to sing with new meaning:
My country 'tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing.
Land where my fathers died, land of the Pilgrim's pride,
From every mountainside, let freedom ring!
[22] And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true.
[23] And so let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire.
Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York.
Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania.
Let freedom ring from the snow-capped Rockies of Colorado.
Let freedom ring from the curvaceous slopes of California.
But not only that:
Let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia.
Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee.
Let freedom ring from every hill and molehill of Mississippi.
From every mountainside, let freedom ring.
[24] And when this happens, and when we allow freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when allof God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual:
Free at last! Free at last!
Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!
Vocabulary
Five score years: a score year is 25 years; so, five score years is 125 years.
Understanding Questions:
According to Martin Luther King Jr.,
1. Why aren't "Negros", as quoted by Martin Luther King, free more than a hundred years after the signature of the Emancipation Proclamation by Abraham Lincoln?
2. Explain the sentence: "the Negro is still languished in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land".
3. When King says "we've come here today to dramatize a shameful condition". What is this "dramatization"?
4. Why does King say that they come to the capital to "cash a check"?
5. What is the importance of "now" to democracy?
6. According to Luther King, are there people who think that the march is just a way of expressing anger, and that in a few days Negro will forget it and continue to work? What does King say to these people?
7. What does he say about violent protests? Is he asking for violent or non-violent protests?
8. Does he encourage the condemnation of all white people?
9. What is Luther King demanding from society, in relation to civil rights?
10. Luther King says that some people ask him "when will you be satisfied?" What's his answer?
11. What does he say about police?
12. In the "I have a dream" part of his speach, he says that his dream is rooted in the American Dream. What is the American Dream?
13. He starts quoting "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal". From what text is this quotation?
14. Explain the sentence: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character".
15. When you say "I have a dream", you image a future situation. But does King want freedom to be te future or to be the present for Negros? Where, in his speech, can you find this answer?
Analysis and Research Questions
1. What is the importance of justice in his speech? Is it an appeal to ethos, logos or pathos? Explain.
2. How does he appeal to pathos?
4. What are the literary strategies mainly used in the speech?
5. Compare Martin Luther King, Thoureau and Emerson's texts in relation to the idea of justice and non-conformism.
6. Compare King and Gandhi in relation to the idea of non-violence.
7. Research about The "Montgomery Bus Boycott". What was it about? Who participated?
8. Compare this non-violent boycott to Thoureau's idea of not paying taxes.
9. Compare the boycott, the non-paying taxes and Gandhi's criticism of the Salt Tax to brazilian's bus fare's protests. How are they similar and how are they different?
10. What's the genre of the Luther King's text?
11. Describe the context of its publication.
Emerson, Thoreau, Gandhi and King: did they agree in the destitution of all kinds of government and society?
Civil Disobedience, Justice and Non-Violence: Thoreau and Emerson; Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.
Homework:
Watch the videos below on Mahatma Gandhi's (1869 – 1948) influence on Martin Luther King Jr. , and Tolstoi's and, later on, Thoreau's influence on Gandhi, and write an essay about justice, society and non-violence.

No, they didn't.
Emerson and Thoreau were read by Liev Tolstói, who was read by Gandhi and influenced him. Later on, Gandhi also read Thoreau, recommended by Tolstói. Martin Luther King was also influenced by Gandhi and Thoreau. He talks about Gandhi several times.
Emerson's individualism (and thoughts on Transcendentalism) found that solution was in self-reliance and not taking part in society. Thoreau, on the other hand, even though he agreed with Emerson in the matter that men should be "men first, subject later", his writings point out a search for a better government, not the end of any government. However, if this better government is the one that doesn't govern at all, some readers think Thoreau has anarchist inclinations.
In Gandhi's and Luther King's speeches, we don't have the same inclinations. Gandhi and King fought against unjust laws, not against society itself, or the government itself. Their target was injustice.
Curiosities about Thoreau:
Even though Thoreau was part of the Transcendentalists, he didn't take much interest in the afterlife. For that, he replied "one life at a time".
Thoreau's decision not to pay taxes was a form of not participating in a government that allowed slavory and was in war against Mexico. After spending the night in jail, it is said that he wrote his "civil disobedience". He left jail because his aunt paid for him.
His work, "Civil Disobedience", was admired by the famous writer Liev Tolstói, who, in a letter, recommended it to Gandhi, a young Indian arrested in South Africa at the time.
Self-Reliance
by Ralph Waldo Emerson
Gandhi quotes Thoreau:
1942 – Gandhi - appeal “To American Friends” - wrote: “you have given me a teacher in Thoreau, who furnished me through his essay on the “Duty of Civil Disobedience” scientific confirmation of what I was doing in South Africa.
1942 – Gandhi – writes to Franklin Roosevelt: “I have profited greatly by the writings of Thoreau and Emerson".
About the Civil Disobedience, Gandhi says: the essay “contained the essence of his political philosophy, not only as India’s struggle related to the British, but as to his own views of the relation of citizens to government”.
THREE PRINCIPLES OF CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE: THOREAU, GANDHI, AND KING
By Nick Gier, Professor Emeritus, University of Idaho (ngier@uidaho.edu)
published in Lewiston Morning Tribune, January 15, 2006.
Extracts from the article:
The 3 principals of civil disobedience:
1- Respect the law even while disobeying it (injustice) – non-violence isn’t undermine law, but repeal injustice: laws that discriminate bust be abolished; Indian outcastes, African-Americans, and gays do not want “special rights”; they simply want the rights that all others enjoy.
2- You should plead guilty to any violation of the law. As Gandhi explains: “I am here to . . . submit cheerfully to the highest penalty that can be inflicted upon me for what in law is a deliberate crime and what appears to me to be the highest duty of a citizen.” Gandhi instructed his disciples to take the penance of their oppressors upon themselves. Some of Gandhi’s judges felt as if they were the ones charged and convicted. Thoreau said that his one night in jail made the state look foolish.
3- You should attempt to convert your opponent by demonstrating the justice of your cause. Active nonviolence does not seek, as Gandhi says, “to defeat or humiliate your opponents, but to win their friendship and understanding.”


